Thursday, February 17, 2011

Humans Living in East Africa 200,000 Years Ago Were as Complex in their Behavior as Humans Living Today

John Shea, Ph.D., Refutes Long-Standing Myth About Human Origins

"Stone points dating to at least 104,000 years ago from Omo Kibish, Ethiopia. These points, shaped by pressure-flaking and likely used as projectile points are more than 65,000 years older than the oldest similar artifacts from the European Upper Paleolithic Period. The Omo Kibish toolmakers showed equal skill at making similar points out of very different kinds of stone.

STONY BROOK, N.Y., February 17, 2011— In a paper recently published in Current Anthropology, SBU Professor John Shea disproves the myth that the earliest humans were significantly different from us. The idea that human evolution follows a progressive trajectory is one of the most deeply-entrenched assumptions about Homo sapiens evolution. In fact, archaeologists have long believed that modern human behaviors emerged tens of thousands of years after our species first evolved. And while scientists disagreed over whether the process was gradual or quick, they have agreed that Homo sapiens once lived who were very different from us.

“Archaeologists have been focusing on the wrong measurement of early human behavior,” says John Shea, Ph.D, professor of Anthropology at SBU and a Research Associate with the Turkana Basin Institute in Kenya. “The search has been for evidence of ‘behavioral modernity,’ a quality supposedly unique to Homo sapiens, when archaeologists ought to have been investigating ‘behavioral variability,’ a quantitative dimension to the behavior of all living things.”

Early humans were not “behaviorally modern,” meaning they did not collect difficult-to-procure foods, nor did they use complex technologies like traps and nets. But, according to Shea, there is now evidence that some of the behaviors associated with modern humans—specifically our capacity for wide behavioral variability, —did occur among early humans.

The European Upper Paleolithic archaeological record has long been the standard against which the behavior of earlier and non-European humans is compared. During the Upper Paleolithic (45,000-12,000 years ago), Homo sapiens fossils first appeared, together with complex tool technology, carved bone tools, complex projectile weapons, advanced techniques for using fire, cave art, beads and other personal adornments. Similar behaviors are either universal or very nearly so among recent humans, and, thus, archaeologists cite evidence for these behaviors as evidence of human behavioral modernity.

Yet, the oldest Homo sapiens fossils occur between 100,000-200,000 years ago in Africa and southern Asia and in contexts lacking clear and consistent evidence for such behavioral modernity. For decades anthropologists contrasted these earlier “archaic” African and Asian humans with their “behaviorally-modern” Upper Paleolithic counterparts, explaining the differences between them in terms of a single “Human Revolution” that fundamentally changed human biology and behavior. Archaeologists disagree about the causes, timing, pace, and characteristics of this revolution, but there is a consensus that the behavior of the earliest Homo sapiens was significantly different than that of more-recent “modern” humans.

Professor Shea tested the hypothesis that there were differences in behavioral variability between earlier and later Homo sapiens using stone tool evidence dating to between 250,000-6,000 years ago in eastern Africa, which features the longest continuous archaeological record of Homo sapiens behavior. “A systematic comparison of variability in stone tool making strategies over the last quarter-million years shows no single behavioral revolution in our species’ evolutionary history,” notes Professor Shea. “Instead, the evidence shows wide variability in stone tool making strategies over the last quarter-million years and no single behavioral revolution. Particular changes in stone tool technology are explicable in terms of principles of behavioral ecology and the costs and benefits of different tool making strategies.”

The study, entitled “Homo sapiens Is as Homo sapiens Was: Behavioral Variability vs. ‘Behavioral Modernity’ in Paleolithic Archaeology,” has important implications for archaeological research on human origins. “Comparing the behavior of our most ancient ancestors to Upper Paleolithic Europeans holistically and ranking them in terms of their “behavioral modernity” is a waste of time,” argues Shea. “There are no such things as modern humans, just Homo sapiens populations with the capacity for a wide range of behavioral variability. Whether this range is significantly different from that of earlier and other hominin species remains to be discovered, but the best way to advance our understanding of human behavior is by researching the sources of behavioral variability.”

About Stony Brook University
Part of the State University of New York system, Stony Brook University encompasses 200 buildings on 1,450 acres. In the 53 years since its founding, the University has grown tremendously, now with nearly 25,000 students and 2,200 faculty, and is recognized as one of the nation’s important centers of learning and scholarship. It is a member of the prestigious Association of American Universities, and ranks among the top 100 national universities in America and among the top 50 public national universities in the country according to the 2010 U.S. News & World Report survey. Stony Brook University co-manages Brookhaven National Laboratory, as one of an elite group of universities, including Berkeley, University of Chicago, Cornell, MIT, and Princeton that run federal research and development laboratories. SBU is a driving force of the Long Island economy, with an annual economic impact of $4.65 billion, generating nearly 60,000 jobs, and accounts for nearly 4% of all economic activity in Nassau and Suffolk counties, and roughly 7.5 percent of total jobs in Suffolk County.

31 comments:

  1. Interesting man. Very interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good stuff, I shared the link with a few people who would like this.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's kind of crazy to think that humans then are not too much different now. They lack the technology that we do but they are more similar than we thought.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've heard of this before. Generally speaking, humans have had the same mental capacities throughout time, it's just that the tools with which we use in society have evolved quite a bit in 200,000 years.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting remifications for our timelines, certainly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hmm an interesting read! Pretty unbelievable if you ask me about it!

    ReplyDelete
  7. to be honest how could scientists think that they did behave much differently, genetics plays a huge part in personality and them also being human means they will act like humans.

    ReplyDelete
  8. At the end of the day you have to make do with whatever you have got.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's amazing how long people have been around. All the complexities of just being human is wonderful. And that we haven't wiped ourselves out yet is also awesome.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Somehow im not surprised, i mean nothing really implies we would have changed that much.

    ReplyDelete
  11. oh really? why didnt they have phone and internet back then?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thank you so much, this just officially won me an argument with someone! Following both blogs with glee now!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Wow, very nice post. I'm going to take my time to read this thoroughly again. Thank you! +following!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Well we had to start becoming complex at some point. Interesting read.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Nice, I'm learning about this kind of stuff in one of my classes actually.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I just finished up reading an anthropology book that discussed a variety of different cultures. These guys weren't in it, but it was a pretty interesting read. If anyone liked this article you might also like it: "The Evolution of Human Societies"

    ReplyDelete
  17. Fascinating. Where is your science now?

    ReplyDelete
  18. ah not too surprising. i still see some people behaving like apes ;)

    ReplyDelete
  19. You can look at some people these days and see that we haven't changed.The only thing that has changed is the technology we have, most of which has evolved from the basic tools etc that they invented back then.

    ReplyDelete
  20. many characteristics of being human are contained within our DNA, and since it hadn't changed much in that 200,000 years, it's logical that humans hadn't changed much since then...

    ReplyDelete
  21. Sad to hear we aren't evolving and improving, but eh, at least we're not devolving like it seems like at times...

    ReplyDelete
  22. Interesting that they can infer that from fossils and tools, and the like.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Great facts (Y)

    Following ,
    http://ahdiu.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete